In his impressive study, Al-Ittijah al-Salafi ‘ind al-Shaf’iyyah, Dr.
In one article you claim that being majority is irrelevant in another you attempt to claim that a large amount Shafis were in reality athari.
Where did I say that this is an argument for the truth of Atharism? My intention here is different, and that is to show that Shafi jurists were not always predominantly Ash'aris and that Athari aqeedah extends beyond the circle of Hanbali jurists.
In one article you claim that being majority is irrelevant in another you attempt to claim that a large amount Shafis were in reality athari.
Where did I say that this is an argument for the truth of Atharism? My intention here is different, and that is to show that Shafi jurists were not always predominantly Ash'aris and that Athari aqeedah extends beyond the circle of Hanbali jurists.